Blue Danube to Black Sea Day 14: National Pride and Ambiguous Memory
Friday 7 June
I’m glad of the late flight that gives us this
additional day in Budapest. Well, Pest actually. We begin by walking upstream
along the promenade. We come to the “shoes” in memory of the Jews who were
hurled into the icy Danube in 1944. It hardly needs saying how moving this
sight is: boots, shoes, slippers, what looks like a little girl’s dancing
shoes. Votive lights with Hebrew texts have been placed among, and even inside,
these infinitely forlorn objects, so full of pathos, that speak more eloquently
than words ever could about “the heartbreak at the heart of things”. And when I
remember that the South Koreans drowned in a Danube within sight of this
shrine, it simply adds to the painfulness of this part of the river bank.
As we walk on, the immense Parliament building looms up
above us. We go inside the visitor centre and find that there is a place
available on an English language tour of the building this afternoon. So I’ll
come back to that later. The sun has come out and it’s warming up rapidly. We
walk out of the shadow side of the Parliament (nice turn of phrase?) and into
the sunshine. The glare from this extraordinary building is almost painful.
Soldiers are on guard. The anti-terror barricades are not the crude lumpish
blocks you see in London but integrated into the architecture of the square,
which is surrounded by fine buildings. Indeed, everywhere in central Budapest
the buildings are on a monumental scale. The green spaces are a relief from
this surfeit of grandeur whether its imperial, neo-classical, art nouveau or
modern. It’s tempting to compare it with Paris (again) but the difference is
that Pest has no Notre Dame and no Left Bank to set off the monumental with
something more intimate in scale. Buda has those things of course, but once
these were separate cities and their respective urban styles architecture seem
to tell different stories. Like Newcastle and Gateshead, maybe?

We go inside the Basilica of St Stephen’s. Aggressively
neo-classical, vast and imposing, a noble Greek cross that on the outside fully
rises to the challenge of the imperial architecture that surrounds it. But the
interior feels gloomy and lifeless. Like St Sava in Belgrade, far from bringing
me to my knees it leaves me cold. But it’s humanised by a group of young
schoolchildren at the front of the nave who are singing their hearts out under
the tutelage of their teacher.
But the gloom of the Basilica is more than made up for by
our discovering the Church of the Assumption by the river. It’s Pest’s parish
church and its oldest. The site is ancient: under glass in the floor we can see
extensive remains of the Roman camp that once stood here on the bank of the
Danube. There are remains of Romanesque and this provides the highlight of this
rebuilt gothic church. Behind the high altar is all that’s left of some wall
paintings. The crowning glory is a most beautiful depiction of the Assumption.
It’s graceful and delicate, art that is full of love and devotion. But I’m even
more moved by a painting to one side. It once showed Christ in the Garden of
Gethsemane. Almost all of him is lost, except his hands held together in
prayer, just like the famous Dürer drawing. And what’s best of all in this
Romanesque Wall painting, surviving intact, is the image of God the Father,
listening intently to his Son’s prayer as he hides behind a tree. The
association must be to the Garden of Eden - how winsomely it’s done, and how
rich theologically!
And so back to the Parliament Building for the guided tour.
I won’t describe the architecture: the travel writers can indulge their
superlatives and rhapsodise about this amazing edifice. Suffice to say that
it’s a cross between the fairy-tale Chateau of Pierrefonds in northern France,
and St Pancras Station with, of course, the obvious homage to the British
Houses of Parliament (but this is in much better condition). National rhetoric
and a (very very) proudly imagined past come into things at every turn - in the
symbolism of the architecture, the sculptures of national heroes and the
ordinary Volk - artists, craftspeople, scientists, philosophers, engineers.
Gold leaf is on display in abundance.

But the clue to this place lies at its geometric centre.
Here, underneath the dome (more Florence than Rome or St Paul’s), the crown
regalia are kept in a sealed case of toughened glass. Round it is an innocent
looking rope - but alarmed. That in turn is guarded by two military officers
with guns. Touch the ropes, alarms will sound and the soldiers will as likely
as not fire - that’s the message we are given. Oh, and photography, allowed
everywhere else on the tour, is not permitted here, again on pain of - well,
who knows? The regalia which go back to the eleventh century and Hungary’s
king-Saint Stephen I are clearly treated as holy objects, the embodiment of the
nation. Is this the real reason photography is forbidden, not any security risk
so much as the violation of a sacred space that bears mystical significance?
I walk back via Freedom Square. On the far side is a memorial
to the hundreds of thousands of Hungarians who perished in the Holocaust. Most
were Jews, but we must never forget the Roma, the political dissidents and the
gays who also ended their days in the extermination camps. This memorial shows
the eagle of the Third Reich descending on Hungary brandishing a huge and evil
claw bearing the year 1944 that’s about to lay hold on and devour the woman
below, the personification of Hungary. On the ground is a classical pillar
twisted out of shape. It’s powerful but it’s hard not to read this grotesque
image as kitsch. There is an inscription in Hebrew and Hungarian, and a date -
19 March 1944. This was the day the German eagle landed on its former ally, its
hanging black claw dragging Hungary viciously into the Reich that would last a
thousand years. “That’s what the Nazis did to us.”
But that way of telling the story by blaming the Nazis has
become extremely politicised. It seems that Viktor Orban had the memorial
erected under cover of darkness and without consultation in order to establish
once and for all where blame for the Hungarian holocaust belonged. But history
does not bear this out. Hungary appeared to welcome the Nazi occupation with
the same enthusiasm as Austria did. What’s more, Hungarians were not only complicit
with their occupiers but initiated their own outrages against their fellow
citizens including the Jews murdered in the river. (There was also a terrible
massacre at Novi Sad, then under Hungarian rule. I don’t recall hearing
anything about it when we were there.) So those protesting against this
memorial, who include liberal politicians, civic leaders, academics and
relatives of the victims, have brought memorabilia from 1944 and laid them out
at the foot of the monument. They have also displayed images, photographs
explanatory texts in all the world’s principal languages. They are challenging
the Orban government to take responsibility for what happened in that terrible
year and tell the truth about Hungarian involvement in it. This protest memorial
has not been swept away - yet. If it were to be, there would be an outcry.
Of all that I’ve seen on this cruise, this memorial will, I
think, stay with me longest. The image is meant to be unforgettable and it is -
for all the wrong reasons. It encapsulates so many of the dilemmas of Central
and Eastern Europe that we’ve been faced with on this journey: how nations tell
their stories, how they face up to their past, how they define their identities
in the present, what kind of futures they aspire to. To that extent, the
rhetoric of the Parliament Building and of this memorial is the same. Am I
right to be worried about the nationalism they both represent in this beautiful
but paradoxical country? And can its Europeanism save it from all that’s
corrupting in the emergence of the politics of the far right?
********
And if this is a question for Hungary, what about the other
Danube lands from Germany and Austria in the west to Serbia and Croatia,
Romania and Bulgaria in the east? And what about the UK? While we’ve been away
the results of the European Parliament elections have shown how the postwar politics of our continent are being reframed in ways that couldn’t have been
predicted when we were growing up and when the postwar political consensus
seemed settled not only for our own lifetimes but those of our children too.
Britain is as exposed to these changes as anywhere else in Europe.
It’s tempting to see history as offering precedents. The rise of right wing populism across the world suggests parallels with the 1930s. I’ve wondered whether visiting Orban’s Budapest in the 2010s is like visiting Berlin in the 1930s - beautiful, seductive but full of portents. I’m sure this is far too facile. “The chief practical use of history is to deliver us from plausible historical analogies” said the Liberal politician James Bryce quoted in a recent article in the London Review of Books, “Populism and the People” by Jan-Werner Müller. Travelling around central and eastern Europe opens your eyes to the history of our continent but we should be wary of drawing parallels. That may be one of the most important things I’ve learned here. Good Europeanism must be earthed in a proper use of history, not an imagined past.
So if this voyage has taught me anything, it’s made me a better
European, to quote the fellow-traveller who shared her thoughts with me as we
were drawing into Novi Sad. What does “better” mean? Not so much that I’m more
convinced than ever of the importance of the European Project, though I think
that’s true. No, I mean that it’s revealed how little I knew my continent, how
western my assumptions about had been, how much I need to learn about all those
who share our common European home, whether the people next door or those who
are further down the street.
And what’s true of the continent I call home is also true of
the planet I call home. If travel doesn’t make us citizens of the world, why
take ourselves off at some cost to cruise down a far-off river not our own?
But it is our own. That’s the point. We are privileged to see what we have
seen. It’s been hugely stimulating and enjoyable. But beyond the pleasures of a holiday, the
companionship and conversation, stories to tell and memories to share,
sightseeing, fresh air, relaxation and rest, what matters for travel, what
is ultimately important, is how it changes us, and therefore what we do next. I suppose that's why I've been writing this blog of our voyage - not as a record of things seen and done, but as a way of woolgathering, thinking on the page about how and why it should make a difference.
But for now it is time to get on the coach that will take us to the airport.
No comments:
Post a Comment